Albert Einstein Letter to The New York Times. December 4, 1948 New Palestine Party. Visit of Menachen Begin and Aims of Political Movement

Source: Text from original microfilm

TO THE EDITORS OF NEW YORK TIMES:

Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the „Freedom Party“ (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.
The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin’s political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.
Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin’s behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement.
The public avowals of Begin’s party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.

Attack on Arab Village
A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants (240 men, women, and children) and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin.
The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party.
Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model.
During the last years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing, and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and exacted a heavy tribute.
The people of the Freedom Party have had no part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots.

Discrepancies Seen
The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a „Leader State“ is the goal.
In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin’s efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin.

The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism.

ISIDORE ABRAMOWITZ,
HANNAH ARENDT,
ABRAHAM BRICK,
RABBI JESSURUN CARDOZO,
ALBERT EINSTEIN,
HERMAN EISEN, M.D.,
HAYIM FINEMAN, M. GALLEN, M.D.,
H.H. HARRIS,
ZELIG S. HARRIS,
SIDNEY HOOK,
FRED KARUSH,
BRURIA KAUFMAN,
IRMA L. LINDHEIM,
NACHMAN MAISEL,
SEYMOUR MELMAN,
MYER D. MENDELSON, M.D.,
HARRY M. OSLINSKY,
SAMUEL PITLICK,
FRITZ ROHRLICH,
LOUIS P. ROCKER,
RUTH SAGIS,
ITZHAK SANKOWSKY,
I.J. SHOENBERG,
SAMUEL SHUMAN,
M. SINGER,
IRMA WOLFE,
STEFAN WOLFE.
New York, Dec. 2, 1948

Einstein_Letter_NYT_4_Dec_1948 (PDF)

Quelle: Albert Einstein Letter to The New York Times. December 4, 1948 New Palestine Party. Visit of Menachen Begin and Aims of Political Movement Discussed : Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt, Sidney Hook, et.al. : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

Von mir bislang unkommentiert: Der Artikel „Arabisch kommt uns nicht in die Schule!“ | geteilt von „Übermedien“

Arabisch kommt uns nicht in die Schule! | Übermedien:

„Ausländische Kinder sollen im Saarland ihre Heimatsprache als zusätzliches Unterrichtsfach belegen können – um ihre Kompetenzen und die Mehrsprachigkeit zu stärken. Mit Hilfe von „Bild“ machen Rechte daraus eine skandalöse Kapitulation.“

Quelle: Arabisch kommt uns nicht in die Schule! | Übermedien

Politiker einfach intelligent und konsequent zur Rede stellen

Angeregt durch diesen Kommentar von Peter Kurz in der WAZ…

Ich meine: Kann man nicht mal intelligent nachfragen sowie konsequent darauf hinweisen, dass Argumente totaler Schwachsinn sind und also keinesfalls begründen können, was beschlossen wurde – und was denn bitteschön die tatsächlichen Gründe sind?

Z.B. dann, wenn derlei unlogischer Quatsch verzapft wird, wie hier bzgl. Mietpreisbremse:

„Auch das im Koalitionsvertrag niedergeschriebene Argument, dass die Mietpreisbremse private Investitionen in den Wohnungsbau gebremst habe, ist unredlich. Die Mietpreisbremse gilt nämlich nur für Bestandswohnungen, die an einen neuen Mieter vermietet werden. Wenn hier aus guten Gründen eine Hürde für die Mietpreissteigerung eingezogen wird, so macht das doch gerade das Investieren in Neubauten attraktiver. Denn hier gilt die Mietpreisbremse gar nicht. Hier galt sie nie. Also war das Investieren immer attraktiv, wurde nie durch die jetzt verantwortlich gemachte Mietpreisbremse behindert.

Und wenn auch die Kappungsgrenzen-Verordnung gestrichen wird, so fällt eine weitere Schranke – für Mieterhöhungen in bestehenden Verträgen.

Schwarz-Gelb begründet seine rigiden Pläne damit, dass man die Rahmenbedingungen für Investoren verbessern will, damit mehr Wohnraum geschaffen wird.“

Quelle: Schwarz-Gelb dreht den Mieterschutz zurück – WZ.de

„Links“

Definition der „Salonkolumnisten“ (kannte ich bisher nicht):

Wenn die Bezeichnung „links“ eine Marke wäre, woraus bestünde ihr Kern? Was würden mir Marx und Bebel, Otto Wels und Willy Brandt aus dem Sozialistenhimmel zuflüstern, wenn ich sie um Orientierung bäte?

  • Alle Menschen sind gleich viel wert und sollen gleiche Rechte haben!
  • Nehme Armut nicht als gegeben hin! Niemand sollte arm sein!
  • Es soll keine Klassenschranken geben!
  • Achte die Arbeit!
  • Kämpfe gegen Nationalismus, Antisemitismus und Rassenhass!
  • Kämpfe gegen Kriege, die aus nationalistischen, imperialistischen oder wirtschaftlichen Interessen geführt werden!
  • Kämpfe für geistige Freiheit und gegen Unterdrückung!
  • Glaube keiner Religion!
  • Bilde dich! Nutze die Erkenntnisse der Wissenschaft!
  • Begrüße den Fortschritt! Langfristig führt Geschichte zu mehr Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit und Wohlstand.

Quelle: Stegner hat recht – Salonkolumnisten